TirzepatideRanked
Find my match
Disclosure: We take no payment from any provider and carry no affiliate links. Provider links are rel="nofollow" and never sponsored. How we make money
Prices 15 verified of 70 Rubric v1.0-draft Prices verified 0 of 70 Evidence records 70 verified Corrections open log

Head to head

LillyDirect vs Noom Med: Pricing, Evidence and What Neither Discloses

LillyDirect is cheaper on the lowest captured all-in figure, by $50 a month ($149 against $199).

Direct answer

LillyDirect is cheaper on the lowest captured all-in figure, by $50 a month ($149 against $199). Both providers' undisclosed fields are shown below rather than omitted, and neither has named its fulfilling pharmacy to us.

Answer last reviewed: 2026-07-26

The short answer

LillyDirect is cheaper on the lowest captured all-in figure, by $50 a month ($149 against $199). LillyDirect's figures are captured by us; Noom Med's are provider-reported.

Price is one of five fields that matter, and it is the only one either company reliably publishes. The others — which pharmacy fills the prescription, whether the price holds as your dose rises, what is refunded if you stop, and whether the programme can lawfully serve your state — are unverified for both.

Compare at a maintenance dose, not at signup

The tirzepatide label describes 2.5 mg as treatment initiation and states it is not approved as a maintenance dosage. You take it for four weeks and then never again. Where a programme tiers by dose, the advertised figure is usually that starting dose — so a comparison built on it ranks these two on a price neither charges after month one.

Ask both for the all-in monthly cost at 10 mg, which is a recommended maintenance dosage, and compare those.

What neither has told us

Neither LillyDirect nor Noom Med has named its fulfilling pharmacy or its registration class. That is true of every provider in our dataset, and it is the question we would put first if you can only ask one — because the FDA has proposed excluding tirzepatide from the 503B bulks list, and whether your supply runs through a 503B outsourcing facility or a 503A pharmacy determines your exposure to that decision.

The comparison that outranks both

Check insurance first. Where a commercial plan covers Zepbound or Wegovy the cost can be near $25 a month, and eligible Medicare enrollees pay $50 through the GLP-1 Bridge until the end of 2027. Both sit below every self-pay route including every compounded programme in our dataset.

Failing that, brand Zepbound is $299 to $449 direct from LillyDirect and both approved oral GLP-1s start at $149 — figures worth having in front of you before choosing between two compounded programmes.

LillyDirect against Noom Med, lowest figure we hold by molecule
TirzepatideLillyDirect $299Noom Med $299SemaglutideLillyDirect — not capturedNoom Med $199LillyDirectNoom Med
Show this figure as a table
Data table
ItemLillyDirectNoom Med
Tirzepatide$299$299
Semaglutidenot captured$199
Solid = captured by us. Dashed = provider-reported. Hatched = no figure held. Evidence grades.
Same fields, both providers
Same fields, both providers
FieldLillyDirectNoom Med
Lowest captured all-in$149/mo$199/mo
Lowest tirzepatide$299/mo$299/mo
Lowest semaglutide$199/mo
Records we hold82
Evidence statusVerified VerifiedProvider-reported Reported
Fulfilling pharmacy named to usnono
Registration class disclosednono
State availability verifiednono
Cancellation terms captured

A dash means no figure held. How we grade evidence.

Unverified rows are shown, not dropped.
Every captured record for LillyDirect and Noom Med
ProviderProgramFormulationDose coverageMedicationRequired feesAll-in monthlyPrice typeEvidenceCaptured
LillyDirectmanufacturer_directbrand oral, FDA-approved$149$149RecurringReported2026-07-06
Noom Medprepaidcompounded injectable$199$199Commitment tierReported2026-07-06
LillyDirectmanufacturer_directbrand injectable, FDA-approved$299$299RecurringReported2026-07-06
LillyDirectbrand directbrand Zepbound single-dose vialSelf Pay Journey Program$0RecurringVerified2026-07-27
Noom Medprepaidcompounded injectable$299$299Commitment tierReported2026-07-06
LillyDirectbrand directbrand Zepbound single-dose vialSelf Pay Journey Program$0RecurringVerified2026-07-27
LillyDirectbrand directbrand Zepbound single-dose vialSelf Pay Journey Program$0RecurringVerified2026-07-27
LillyDirectbrand directbrand Zepbound single-dose vialSelf Pay Journey Program$0RecurringVerified2026-07-27
LillyDirectbrand directbrand Zepbound single-dose vialSelf Pay Journey Program$0RecurringVerified2026-07-27
LillyDirectbrand directbrand Zepbound single-dose vialSelf Pay Journey Program$0RecurringVerified2026-07-27

Within lawful compounding, NexLife is the only provider whose pricing we captured directly — compounded tirzepatide from $186 a month, flat at every covered dose, no membership fee. See its plans.

Questions readers actually ask

Is LillyDirect cheaper than Noom Med?

LillyDirect is cheaper on the lowest captured all-in figure, by $50 a month ($149 against $199).

Why is LillyDirect marked verified and Noom Med not?

We read LillyDirect's figure on its own published page and archived it with a date. We have not done that for Noom Med, so its figure is the provider's claim rather than our capture.

Does LillyDirect or Noom Med name its compounding pharmacy?

Neither. Two providers in our dataset do, and this is the field our rubric weights most heavily, so neither can score above 45 of 100.

Cite this pageCC BY 4.0

Tirzepatide Ranked. “LillyDirect vs Noom Med: Pricing, Evidence and What Neither Discloses.” S.J Partners LLC, 2026-07-26. https://tirzepatideranked.com/compare/lillydirect-vs-noom-med/

Quote the capture date beside a figure, not the date you read this page. Why.

Report an error

Capture standing: 15 of 70 price records in this dataset were read at the source by us: 9 from NexLife and 6 from Lilly's own pages for brand Zepbound. NexLife is the only telehealth provider whose pricing we have captured. Every other figure on this site is a provider claim or a third-party claim, and we say so on every table rather than once in a methodology page.

Comparing 0 of 4